Luis v. United States Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Luis v. United States, docket number 14-419. The case concerns the government’s…
Radio Special
Radio: Supreme Court Oral Argument: Kansas v. Cheever
2013-10-26T17:50:00-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJkZWZhdWx0c1wvQ2FwaXRvbF9kZWZhdWx0LWltYWdlLmpwZyIsImVkaXRzIjp7InJlc2l6ZSI6eyJmaXQiOiJjb3ZlciIsImhlaWdodCI6NTA2fX19The Supreme Court heard the case, Kansas v. Cheever which argued that when a defendant presents expert testimony that he was not in the required mental-state to commit a capital offense because of methamphetamine use, does the State violate the defendant’s right against self-incrimination by presenting rebuttal testimony based on a court-ordered mental evaluation of the defendant?
The Supreme Court heard the case, Kansas v. Cheever which argued that when a defendant presents expert testimony that he was not in the requ…
read more
The Supreme Court heard the case, Kansas v. Cheever which argued that when a defendant presents expert testimony that he was not in the required mental-state to commit a capital offense because of methamphetamine use, does the State violate the defendant’s right against self-incrimination by presenting rebuttal testimony based on a court-ordered mental evaluation of the defendant? close
The Supreme Court heard the case, Kansas v. Cheever which argued that when a defendant presents expert testimony that he was not in the requ… read more
The Supreme Court heard the case, Kansas v. Cheever which argued that when a defendant presents expert testimony that he was not in the required mental-state to commit a capital offense because of methamphetamine use, does the State violate the defendant’s right against self-incrimination by presenting rebuttal testimony based on a court-ordered mental evaluation of the defendant? close
Hosting Organization
Series
Related Video
-
-
Harris v. Arizona Oral Argument
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, docket number 14-2…
-
Utah v. Strieff Oral Argument
In the case, Utah v. Strieff, the Court ruled 5-3 that incriminating evidence discovered through an illegal police stop …
-
Trump v. Mazars Oral Argument
The District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Trump v. Mazars, a case concerning a congressio…