Bills in the 111th Congress
-
Sponsor
Michael Arcuri
D-NY 24th
Jul 29, 2010: Passed House
Congress
Actions
July 29, 2010 1:39 PM EDT |
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 231 - 185 (Roll no. 485). (text: CR H6289) |
July 29, 2010 1:39 PM EDT |
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
July 29, 2010 1:32 PM EDT |
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 236 - 179 (Roll no. 484). (consideration: CR H6307) |
July 29, 2010 1:24 PM EDT |
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6307-6308) |
July 29, 2010 11:43 AM EDT |
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of the debate on H. Res. 1569, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart demanded the yeas and nays, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of ordering the previous question until later in the legislative day. |
July 29, 2010 10:48 AM EDT |
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1569. Show Debate Speakers |
July 29, 2010 10:48 AM EDT |
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H6289-6297) |
July 29, 2010 10:47 AM EDT |
On motion to consider the resolution Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H6289) |
July 29, 2010 10:46 AM EDT |
At the conclusion of debate on the Flake point of order, the Chair put the question on consideration of the resolution. |
July 29, 2010 10:31 AM EDT |
POINT OF ORDER AGAINST CONSIDERATION - Mr. Flake stated that the provisions of H. Res. 1569 violate section 426(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 by imposing an unfunded mandate and made a point of order against the consideration of the resolution. Subsequently, the Chair noted that the required threshold of identifying the specific language in question had been met, and the House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the question of consideration. At the conclusion of debate on the question of consideration, the Chair will put the question to wit: Will the House now consider the resolution? |
July 29, 2010 10:30 AM EDT |
By direction of the Committee on Rules, Mr. Arcuri called up the resolution H. Res. 1569, and asked for its immediate consideration. |
July 28, 2010 8:15 PM EDT |
All points of order against consideration of the bill except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI are waived. |
July 28, 2010 8:15 PM EDT |
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 111-578 , by Mr. Arcuri. |
July 28, 2010 | Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 228. |
July 28, 2010 | The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 111-578, by Mr. Arcuri. |