Washington Journal
Review of Health Care Law Oral Arguments
2012-03-28T07:00:02-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvOWEzXC8zMDUwODAtMDItbS5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==Emily Ethridge and Jess Bravin reviewed the previous day Supreme Court oral arguments on the individual mandate provision of the Affordable Care Act which required that citizens purchase health care coverage by 2014 or face a financial penalty. They also previewed upcoming arguments on the expansion of Medicaid, and “severability,” which refers to whether the rest of the health care law can stand if the individual mandate provision is found unconstitutional.
Wilfred Dunn was interviewed outside the Court building about his interest in day 3 oral arguments on the expansion of Medicaid.
Emily Ethridge and Jess Bravin reviewed the previous day Supreme Court oral arguments on the individual mandate provision of the Affordable …
read more
Emily Ethridge and Jess Bravin reviewed the previous day Supreme Court oral arguments on the individual mandate provision of the Affordable Care Act which required that citizens purchase health care coverage by 2014 or face a financial penalty. They also previewed upcoming arguments on the expansion of Medicaid, and “severability,” which refers to whether the rest of the health care law can stand if the individual mandate provision is found unconstitutional.
Wilfred Dunn was interviewed outside the Court building about his interest in day 3 oral arguments on the expansion of Medicaid. close
Wilfred Dunn was interviewed outside the Court building about his interest in day 3 oral arguments on the expansion of Medicaid.
Emily Ethridge and Jess Bravin reviewed the previous day Supreme Court oral arguments on the individual mandate provision of the Affordable … read more
Emily Ethridge and Jess Bravin reviewed the previous day Supreme Court oral arguments on the individual mandate provision of the Affordable Care Act which required that citizens purchase health care coverage by 2014 or face a financial penalty. They also previewed upcoming arguments on the expansion of Medicaid, and “severability,” which refers to whether the rest of the health care law can stand if the individual mandate provision is found unconstitutional.
Wilfred Dunn was interviewed outside the Court building about his interest in day 3 oral arguments on the expansion of Medicaid. close
People in this video
More PeopleHosting Organization
Series
More Videos From
Washington Journal
- Review of Health Care Law Oral Arguments
- Preview of Supreme Court Health Care Oral Arguments on Severability
Related Video
-
Preview of Supreme Court Health Care Oral Arguments on Severability
David Cole talked about severability in relation to a Supreme Court case concerning the Affordable Care Act’s individual…
-
Supreme Court Health Care Law Oral Argument, Day 3, Severability
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the third of the four cases challenging the 2010 health care law. The focus of…
-
Supreme Court Health Care Oral Arguments Coverage
C-SPAN’s coverage of the first day of Supreme Court oral arguments on the 2010 health care law included open phones and …
-
Supreme Court Health Care Law Oral Argument, Day 2
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the second of the four cases challenging the 2010 health care law law. The cas…