Videos

The Bill of Rights Institute and William and Mary Law School hosted a moot court on the FCC v. Fox Television indecency case. The case rests on the FCC’s ban against the use of curse words i…

A panel of Supreme Court experts talked about the Boumediene v. Bush case scheduled for oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court on December 5, 2007, to decide if the Military Commissions…

Panelists discussed the Roberts Court, shifts in the U.S. Supreme Court, and the role of Justice Kennedy as the swing vote. They responded to questions from members of the audience. …

The Institute of Bill of Rights Law, part of the William and Mary School of Law, marked the commencement of the new term of the United States Supreme Court with its 18th annual Supreme Court…

The Institute of Bill of Rights Law, part of the William and Mary School of Law, marked the commencement of the new term of the United States Supreme Court with its 18th annual Supreme Court…

The Institute of Bill of Rights Law, part of the William and Mary School of Law, marked the commencement of the new term of the United States Supreme Court with its 18th annual Supreme Court…

Panelists discussed federalism cases that will come before the Supreme Court in the current term. First, Professor Chermerinsky discussed the effects that past federalism cases have had, inc…

Legal scholars spoke about various Supreme Court cases and about the direction the court was taking under the leadership of Chief Justice Rehnquist. Following their remarks they answered que…

A moot court debated the U.S. Supreme Court case Ferguson v. City of Charleston. At issue in the case is whether public hospitals can test pregnant patients for drug use and inform police of…

Journalists and legal scholars talk about some of the federalism cases the U.S. Supreme Court has chosen to hear in its new term, including discrimination and environmental cases.

Supreme Court scholars and journalists participated in a moot court argument regarding the case Mitchell vs. Helms, which the Supreme Court heard on December 1, 1999. The case focused on whe…

Law professors and Supreme Court correspondents previewed some of the U.S. Supreme Court 1999 term cases, focusing on cases involving federalism. They also discussed federalism, Congress’s p…

Law professors and Supreme Court correspondents previewed the 1999 U.S. Supreme Court term, focusing on a few cases of criminal law and criminal procedure.

The College of William and Mary Law School hosted a conference previewing the Supreme Court’s 1997-98 term. The panel consisted of Supreme Court reporters and law school professors.

Panelists discussed the various civil rights cases that were to come before the Supreme Court that term. The panel was part of the annual preview of the Supreme Court held at the law school …

Solicitor General Dellinger hosted this discussion on a preview of the upcoming Supreme Court term. The forum concentrated on affirmative action cases that will be put before it and how thei…

Participants discussed the role of the Supreme Court in improving U.S. race relations. They examined the implications of the Piscataway v. Taxman case dealing with affirmative action, as wel…

Attorneys argued the case of Clinton v. Jones before a panel of Supreme Court journalists who served as the judges. The Supreme Court on January 13 heard the arguments in the case in which P…

At a two-day conference on the 1996-97 U.S. Supreme Court term, panelists discussed the voting rights issues before the Court this term. The Court has five cases dealing with these issues on…

At a two-day conference the upcoming Supreme Court term, law professors and Supreme Court reporters discussed the legal issues surrounding doctor-assisted suicide. The two main constitutiona…