Clips

Sir this is a Wendy's

• 22 seconds
• 949 views

Sir, this is Wendy's Supreme Court

• 58 seconds
• 200 views

Paul Clement cites the amicus brief by the Center for Growth and Opportunity at Utah State University that argues that social media has benefited a wide diversity of voices, including conser…

• 2 minutes
• 17 views

Kagan - Content v. Speaker

• 2 minutes
• 9 views

Why is Texas an easier case than Florida?

• 2 minutes
• 7 views

Texas law is effort to regulated modern public square

• 2 minutes
• 6 views

Nielsen makes interesting point at very end about Packingham, state action, and the "public interest"

• 2 minutes
• 5 views

Catholics and Protestants

• 1 minute
• 4 views

Core defects in Texas law concern expressive conduct

• 2 minutes
• 3 views

"Sir, This is a Wendy's"

• 17 seconds
• 3 views

First Amendment constrains governments, not private entities

• 2 minutes
• 2 views

Good summary of NetChoice's position re: TX law and state's arguments

• 3 minutes
• 2 views

Lessig/Teachout/Wu and Texas

• 19 seconds
• 2 views

Practically, how would pulling out of TX not constitute discrimination against TX users. ACB is skeptical

• 2 minutes
• 2 views

AG injunctions v. Private Right of Action (ie, what about "Soyboy" case?)

• 2 minutes
• 2 views

Maybe different layers of the tech stack can be regulated differently, ie, hosting curated speech v. conduit

• 2 minutes
• 2 views

Why is the US Gov't not defending a law TX characterizes as public accommodations law?

• 2 minutes
• 2 views

"Hotel California" provision - can the platforms leave Texas?

• 4 minutes
• 1 view

What happens if you want to exclude terrorism content (eg, pro-ISIS) and not anti-terrorism content (e.g., anti-ISIS)?

• 2 minutes
• 1 view