| Part Of Open Phones
Washington Journal
Report Video IssueWashington Journal
Supreme Court Watch
2005-11-08T08:36:31-05:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvNDU4XC8xODk2MTYtMDctbS5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==Professor Rutledge spoke about a case that U.S. Supreme Court nominee Judge Samuel Alito ruled on in 2004, Doe v. Groody. In his dissent, Judge Alito said that police officers had not violated constitutional rights when they strip searched a mother and her ten-year old daughter while carrying out a search warrant that authorized only the search of a man and his home.
Mr. Doe had argued that the search of his family members violated their Fourth Amendment rights to be free of unreasonable search and seizures.
Professor Rutledge spoke about a case that U.S. Supreme Court nominee Judge Samuel Alito ruled on in 2004, Doe v. Groody. In his dissent, Ju…
read more
Professor Rutledge spoke about a case that U.S. Supreme Court nominee Judge Samuel Alito ruled on in 2004, Doe v. Groody. In his dissent, Judge Alito said that police officers had not violated constitutional rights when they strip searched a mother and her ten-year old daughter while carrying out a search warrant that authorized only the search of a man and his home.
Mr. Doe had argued that the search of his family members violated their Fourth Amendment rights to be free of unreasonable search and seizures. close
Mr. Doe had argued that the search of his family members violated their Fourth Amendment rights to be free of unreasonable search and seizures.
Professor Rutledge spoke about a case that U.S. Supreme Court nominee Judge Samuel Alito ruled on in 2004, Doe v. Groody. In his dissent, Ju… read more
Professor Rutledge spoke about a case that U.S. Supreme Court nominee Judge Samuel Alito ruled on in 2004, Doe v. Groody. In his dissent, Judge Alito said that police officers had not violated constitutional rights when they strip searched a mother and her ten-year old daughter while carrying out a search warrant that authorized only the search of a man and his home.
Mr. Doe had argued that the search of his family members violated their Fourth Amendment rights to be free of unreasonable search and seizures. close
People in this video
Hosting Organization
Series
More Videos From
Open Phones
- War in Iraq and Interrogation Limits
- Deficit Reduction
- Capitol Hill Stories
- Supreme Court Watch
- Open Phones
Purchase a Download
Supreme Court Watch
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $4.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Supreme Court Watch
Participating by telephone, Mr. Henderson spoke about the U.S. Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito and cases he was invol…
-
Supreme Court Watch
Participating by telephone, Professor Bloch spoke about the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court. …
-
Open Phones
Telephone lines were open for viewer comments on news of the day. Among the topics discussed were domestic surveillance …
-
Open Phones
Telephone lines were open for comments on news of the day. Among the topics callers discussed was the nomination of Judg…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 2 minutes
- 4 views