Berger v. North Carolina State Conf. of NAACP Oral Argument
2022-03-21T11:27:21-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvY2QxXC8yMDIyMDQxNTE3MTcyNjAwMV9oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, a case on civil procedure and whether state lawmakers can intervene in a lawsuit to defend a voter identification law. Democratic Governor Roy Cooper vetoed the law, but the Republican-controlled North Carolina legislature overrode it. Several lawsuits challenging the law resulted, including one by the North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP. Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger (R) and Speaker of the House Timothy Moore (R) tried to become defendants in the lawsuit. Under civil procedure rules, a person may intervene in a lawsuit if there is no proper representation by the parties involved in the suit. The state legislators that argued the Democratic attorney general is not representing their views or the law adequately in court.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, a case on civil procedure and whether state… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, a case on civil procedure and whether state lawmakers can intervene in a lawsuit to defend a voter identification law. Democratic Governor Roy Cooper vetoed the law, but the Republican-controlled North Carolina legislature overrode it. Several lawsuits challenging the law resulted, including one by the North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP. Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger (R) and Speaker of the House Timothy Moore (R) tried to become defendants in the lawsuit. Under civil procedure rules, a person may intervene in a lawsuit if there is no proper representation by the parties involved in the suit. The state legislators that argued the Democratic attorney general is not representing their views or the law adequately in court. close
People in this video
- Samuel A. Alito Jr. Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Amy Coney Barrett Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Sarah Boyce Deputy Solicitor General North Carolina->Department of Justice
- Stephen G. Breyer Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Neil Gorsuch Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Brett M. Kavanaugh Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- John G. Roberts Jr. Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Sonia Sotomayor Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
-
Elisabeth Theodore Attorney -
David H. Thompson Attorney
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Berger v. North Carolina State Conf. of NAACP Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Morgan v. Sundance, Inc Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Morgan v. Sundance, Inc., a case on arbitration agreements and law.
-
Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, a case on civil procedure and California…
-
Arizona v. San Francisco Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. San Francisco, a case on whether states can defend federal regulatio…
-
Siegel v. Fitzgerald Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Siegel v. Fitzgerald, a case on bankruptcy law.