Attorney for Danco Labs Comments on Abortion Pill Access Oral Argument
Attorney for Danco Laboratories Jessica Ellsworth held a news conference after the Supreme Court heard oral argument in …
FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine Oral Argument
2024-03-26T20:02:57-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvMmU3XC8wMDFcLzE3MTE0NjIyMzNfMDAxLmpwZyIsImVkaXRzIjp7InJlc2l6ZSI6eyJmaXQiOiJjb3ZlciIsImhlaWdodCI6NTA2fX19The Supreme Court heard oral argument in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (AHM), a consolidated case challenging the Food and Drug Administration’s approval for expanded use of the abortion pill mifepristone. The FDA approved this medication in 2000 as part of a two-pill regimen for terminating early pregnancies. In 2016, the FDA expanded the drug’s use from seven to 10 weeks of pregnancy, reduced the number of in-clinic appointments needed, and gave prescribing authority to non-physician health care providers. In 2021 the agency removed the in-person requirement altogether. This case dates to 2023 and was first heard in a federal district court in Texas, where that judge halted the FDA’s approval of the medication. On appeal, a three-judge Fifth Circuit panel then ruled only against the FDA’s expanded access criteria for the drug. This was the high court’s first abortion access case since overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (AHM), a consolidated case challenging the Food and Drug A… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (AHM), a consolidated case challenging the Food and Drug Administration’s approval for expanded use of the abortion pill mifepristone. The FDA approved this medication in 2000 as part of a two-pill regimen for terminating early pregnancies. In 2016, the FDA expanded the drug’s use from seven to 10 weeks of pregnancy, reduced the number of in-clinic appointments needed, and gave prescribing authority to non-physician health care providers. In 2021 the agency removed the in-person requirement altogether. This case dates to 2023 and was first heard in a federal district court in Texas, where that judge halted the FDA’s approval of the medication. On appeal, a three-judge Fifth Circuit panel then ruled only against the FDA’s expanded access criteria for the drug. This was the high court’s first abortion access case since overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022. close
Points of Interest
For quick viewing, C-SPAN provides Points of Interest markers for some events.
Click the play button and tap the screen to see the at the bottom of the player. Tap the to see a complete list of all Points of Interest - click on any moment in the list and the video will play.
Points of Interest
For quick viewing, C-SPAN provides Points of Interest markers for some events.
Click the play button and move your cursor over the video to see the . Click on the marker to see the description and watch.
You can also click the in the lower left of the video player to see a complete list of all Points of Interest from this program - click on any moment in the list and the video will play.
People in this video
- Samuel A. Alito Jr. Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Amy Coney Barrett Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Jessica Ellsworth Attorney
- Neil Gorsuch Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Erin Morrow Hawley Senior Counsel Alliance Defending Freedom
- Ketanji Brown Jackson Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Elena Kagan Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Brett M. Kavanaugh Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Elizabeth B. Prelogar Solicitor General Department of Justice->Office of the Solicitor General
- John G. Roberts Jr. Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Sonia Sotomayor Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
- Clarence Thomas Associate Justice U.S. Supreme Court
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
-
Attorneys for AHM Comment on Abortion Pill Access Oral Argument
Attorney Erin Hawley and other stakeholders representing Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (AHM) spoke to the press afte…
-
Cantero v. Bank of America Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Cantero v. Bank of America, a case on the National Bank Act.
-
NetChoice v. Paxton Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in NetChoice v. Paxton, a case on whether a Texas law can restrict how social medi…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 53 seconds
- 35 views
-
- 2 minutes
- 14 views
-
- 4 minutes
- 11 views