Results for "Landmark Supreme Court Case"
Sorted by

Showing 1 - 20 of 70 Show 70
  • Document Image
    Lesson Plan

    Landmark Supreme Court Case- New York Times v.

    United States, better known as the “Pentagon Papers” case, was a decision expanding freedom of the press and limits on the government's power to interrupt that freedom. ... In a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled that the President’s attempt to prevent the publication was a violation of First Amendment protections for press freedom. ... United States, the arguments made during the case and its legacy.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    The Legacy of New York Times v. United States

    In discussing the landmark Supreme Court Case New York Times v. United States (1971), attorneys Floyd Abrams and Ted Olson talked about the legacy and legal precedent established in the case.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    The Decision in New York Times v. United States

    In discussing the landmark Supreme Court Case New York Times v. ... Ted Olson talked about the ruling in the case. ... Olson also explained the difference decisions in the case.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    New York Times v. United States- Oral Arguments for the United States

    In discussing the landmark Supreme Court Case New York Times v. United States (1971), attorneys Floyd Abrams and Ted Olson explained the oral arguments that the Solicitor General made for the United States in the case.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    New York Times v. United States- Oral Arguments for the New York Times

    In discussing the landmark Supreme Court Case New York Times v. United States (1971), attorneys Floyd Abrams and Ted Olson explained the oral arguments that New York Times attorney made during the case.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    The Legal Framework for New York Times v. United States

    In discussing the landmark Supreme Court Case New York Times v. United States (1971), attorneys Floyd Abrams and Ted Olson discussed the legal precedents and laws that preceded the case. Specifically, they spoke about the Espionage Act and a 1931 case, Near v.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    New York Times v. United States- Other Papers Publishing the Pentagon Papers

    In discussing the landmark Supreme Court Case New York Times v. ... They explained the impact of that action on the government's ability to prosecute the case.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    United States- Nixon's Decision to go to Court

    In discussing the landmark Supreme Court Case New York Times v.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    The Events Leading to New York Times v. United States

    In discussing the landmark Supreme Court Case New York Times v. United States (1971), attorneys Floyd Abrams and Ted Olson discussed Daniel Ellsberg's role in the case.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    The Pentagon Papers and New York Times v. United States

    In discussing the landmark Supreme Court Case New York Times v.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Lesson Plan

    Landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v.

    The landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. ... This lesson uses expert analysis, perspectives from the Tinkers, oral arguments and archival video to explore the case and the legacy of the ruling.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Video Clip

    School Walkouts and Students' Rights

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, and Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, spoke about how the court might rule in cases involving student walkouts.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    2 minutes
    11 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Tinker v. Des Moines- Impact on Student Rights

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, and Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, spoke about the Tinker case's impact on other court cases like Bethel v.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Tinker v. Des Moines- The Majority Opinion

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, and Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, spoke about the majority opinion written by Justice Abe Fortas.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Tinker v. Des Moines- The Dissenting Opinion

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, and Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, spoke about Justice Hugo Black's dissenting opinion.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Des Moines- The Decision in the Case

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, spoke about how she found out about the decision.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Tinker v. Des Moines- Arguments for the Des Moines School Board

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, and Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, discussed the arguments made by attorney Allan Herrick who represented the Des Moines school board.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Tinker v. Des Moines- Arguments for the Tinkers

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, and Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, discussed the arguments made by ACLU attorney Dan Johnston who was representing the Tinkers.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Des Moines- The Path to the Supreme Court

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, and Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, spoke about the path that the Tinker case took to get to the Supreme Court. The case started with a school board meeting and went through the appellate process.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Tinker v. Des Moines- The Day of the Protest

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Mary Beth and John Tinker, petitioners in the case, described their decision to wear black armbands to protest the Vietnam War.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    27 Views
  • Load 20 More