Results for "Landmark Supreme Court Case"
Sorted by

Showing 1 - 20 of 59 Show 59
  • Document Image
    Lesson Plan

    Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

    The landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. ... This lesson uses expert analysis, perspectives from the Tinkers, oral arguments and archival video to explore the case and the legacy of the ruling.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Video Clip

    School Walkouts and Students' Rights

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, and Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, spoke about how the court might rule in cases involving student walkouts.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    2 minutes
    1 View
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Tinker v. Des Moines- Impact on Student Rights

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, and Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, spoke about the Tinker case's impact on other court cases like Bethel v.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Tinker v. Des Moines- The Majority Opinion

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, and Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, spoke about the majority opinion written by Justice Abe Fortas.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Tinker v. Des Moines- The Dissenting Opinion

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, and Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, spoke about Justice Hugo Black's dissenting opinion.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Des Moines- The Decision in the Case

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, spoke about how she found out about the decision.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Tinker v. Des Moines- Arguments for the Des Moines School Board

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, and Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, discussed the arguments made by attorney Allan Herrick who represented the Des Moines school board.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Tinker v. Des Moines- Arguments for the Tinkers

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, and Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, discussed the arguments made by ACLU attorney Dan Johnston who was representing the Tinkers.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Des Moines- The Path to the Supreme Court

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, and Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, spoke about the path that the Tinker case took to get to the Supreme Court. The case started with a school board meeting and went through the appellate process.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Tinker v. Des Moines- The Day of the Protest

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Mary Beth and John Tinker, petitioners in the case, described their decision to wear black armbands to protest the Vietnam War.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Tinker v. Des Moines - The Constitutional Issues

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, spoke about the Constitutional issues and previous Supreme Court cases relating to the case.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Tinker v. Des Moines- The People Involved

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Erik Jaffe, Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group Chair at the Federalist Society, and Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, spoke about the people involved in the case. ... Jaffe explained the members of the Supreme Court during the decision.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Tinker v. Des Moines- Vietnam War Protests

    In discussing the 1969 landmark Supreme Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines, Mary Beth Tinker, a petitioner in the case, spoke about the political climate at the time and protests that were occurring around the nation.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Lesson Plan

    Landmark Supreme Court Case Brandenburg v.

    In Brandenburg, the Court held that hate speech is protected under the First Amendment as long as it does not provoke violence.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Lesson Plan

    Landmark Supreme Court Case: Katz v.

    In this 1967 Supreme Court case, Charles Katz, a bookie, was recorded by the FBI transmitting illegal bets from a telephone booth. The Supreme Court’s decision in the case expanded Americans' right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Lesson Plan

    Landmark Supreme Court Case: Griswold v.

    In a 7-2 decision, the Court ruled that the Connecticut law violated the right to privacy. This landmark Supreme Court case expanded the rights found in the Constitution and paved the way for court cases like Roe v. ... This lesson has students explore the background of the case, the majority and dissenting opinions and the legacy of Griswold v.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    The Importance of Griswold v. Connecticut

    Helen Alvaré and Rachel Rebouché, two law professors at George Mason and Temple universities, discussed the legacy and importance of the landmark Supreme Court Case Griswold v. ... They talked about liberal and conservative perspectives of the case.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    Connecticut's Impact on other Supreme Court Cases

    Law professors Helen Alvaré and Rachel Rebouché discussed the landmark Supreme Court Case Griswold v. ... They spoke about the cases after Griswold v.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    The Dissenting Opinion and Arguments Against Griswold v. Connecticut

    In describing the landmark Supreme Court Case Griswold v. ... A clip of Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork explaining his opinion to the case is also included.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Document Image
    Bell Ringer

    The Decision in Griswold v. Connecticut

    Law professors Helen Alvaré and Rachel Rebouché discussed the landmark Supreme Court Case Griswold v.

    User-Created Content By C-SPAN Classroom
    4 seconds
    21 Views
  • Load 20 More