Glossip v. Gross Oral Argument
2015-05-01T21:05:21-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvMjQyXC8yMDE1MDUwMTIxMDU1MTAwMl9oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Glossip v. Gross, docket number 14-7955. The case concerns whether the use of the drug midazolam in lethal injection executions violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The case was brought by Oklahoma death-row inmates who allege that the sedative called midazolam, the first drug of the three-drug protocol, does not work as intended, resulting in extremely painful death.
On June 29.2015, the court held, 5-4, that lethal injections using midazolam to kill prisoners convicted of capital crimes do not constitute cruel and unusual punishment.
On June 29.2015, the court held, 5-4, that lethal injections using midazolam to kill prisoners convicted of capital crimes do not constitute cruel and unusual punishment.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Glossip v. Gross, docket number 14-7955. The case concerns whether the use of the drug midazolam in… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Glossip v. Gross, docket number 14-7955. The case concerns whether the use of the drug midazolam in lethal injection executions violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The case was brought by Oklahoma death-row inmates who allege that the sedative called midazolam, the first drug of the three-drug protocol, does not work as intended, resulting in extremely painful death.
On June 29.2015, the court held, 5-4, that lethal injections using midazolam to kill prisoners convicted of capital crimes do not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. close
People in this video
-
-
-
-
Robin C. Konrad Attorney
-
-
-
-
-
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
Glossip v. Gross Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $6.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Supreme Court Oral Argument on Right to Same-Sex Marriage
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Obergefell v. Hodges, docket number 14-556 Question 2, which was consolidated w…
-
Supreme Court Oral Argument on State Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Obergefell v. Hodges, docket number 14-556 Question 1, consolidated with t…
-
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie and Fitch Stores Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie and Fitch Stores, docket…
-
Montgomery v. Louisiana Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Montgomery v. Louisiana, docket number 14-280, on whether their 2012 Miller v. …
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 2 minutes
- 74 views
-
- 1 hour
- 56 views
-
- 1 minute
- 26 views
-
- 4 minutes
- 22 views