District of Columbia v. Websy Oral Argument
2017-10-11T18:28:17-04:00https://ximage.c-spanvideo.org/eyJidWNrZXQiOiJwaWN0dXJlcy5jLXNwYW52aWRlby5vcmciLCJrZXkiOiJGaWxlc1wvM2RiXC8yMDE3MTAxMTE4MjkxNzAwMl9oZC5qcGciLCJlZGl0cyI6eyJyZXNpemUiOnsiZml0IjoiY292ZXIiLCJoZWlnaHQiOjUwNn19fQ==The Supreme Court heard oral argument in District of Columbia v. Wesby, a case concerning the Fourth Amendment and probable cause arrests. Theodore Wesby was one of several people initially arrested for unlawful entry after attending a party at a home in the Washington, D.C., Anacostia neighborhood. Police argued the home was vacant. Twenty-one people were arrested. Mr. Wesby and 15 others filed suit claiming unlawful arrest. The Supreme Court was to decide two issues: 1) whether officers violated the partygoers Fourth Amendment rights by arresting them without probable cause, and 2) whether officers were covered under qualified immunity, thereby protecting them from being held liable for damages in civil proceedings.
On January 22, 2018, the Court ruled unanimously that the officers 1) had probable cause to arrest the partygoers, and 2) that the officers were entitled to qualified immunity.
On January 22, 2018, the Court ruled unanimously that the officers 1) had probable cause to arrest the partygoers, and 2) that the officers were entitled to qualified immunity.
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in District of Columbia v. Wesby, a case concerning the Fourth Amendment and probable cause arrests.… read more
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in District of Columbia v. Wesby, a case concerning the Fourth Amendment and probable cause arrests. Theodore Wesby was one of several people initially arrested for unlawful entry after attending a party at a home in the Washington, D.C., Anacostia neighborhood. Police argued the home was vacant. Twenty-one people were arrested. Mr. Wesby and 15 others filed suit claiming unlawful arrest. The Supreme Court was to decide two issues: 1) whether officers violated the partygoers Fourth Amendment rights by arresting them without probable cause, and 2) whether officers were covered under qualified immunity, thereby protecting them from being held liable for damages in civil proceedings.
On January 22, 2018, the Court ruled unanimously that the officers 1) had probable cause to arrest the partygoers, and 2) that the officers were entitled to qualified immunity. close
People in this video
Hosting Organization
Purchase a Download
District of Columbia v. Websy Oral Argument
-
MP4 video - Standard
- Price:
- $4.99
-
MP3 audio - Standard
- Price:
- $0.99
Related Video
-
Gill v. Whitford Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument for Gill v. Whitford, a case involving redistricting in Wisconsin. A lower court in 2016…
-
Carpenter v. United States Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Carpenter v. United States. The case concerns whether a search warrant is needed for law…
-
Byrd v. United States Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Byrd v. United States. The case centers on whether drivers have a reasonable…
-
McCoy v. Louisiana Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in McCoy v. Louisiana. The case concerns whether a death row inmate’s Sixth Amendment…
User Created Clips from This Video
-
- 16 seconds
- 17 views
-
- 19 seconds
- 12 views
-
- 15 seconds
- 8 views
-
- 52 seconds
- 5 views